Tuesday, November 10, 2009

Special Victim Status

I know people who are unwilling to express an opinion on Arab-Israeli issues because the political atmosphere is so charged with animosity. The decades-long conflict has the nature of ancient tribal hatred and vendetta. And it seems that nothing will ever solve the problem except a willingness by all parties to let go of this tribal hatred for a greater good.

But there’s also the peculiar nature of the debate as it manifests in the United States. One might more accurately say “lack of debate,” because in mainstream American politics there is a general taboo against criticizing the government of Israel.

It’s not my intention to analyze the immensely complex and entangled history around this issue. I only want to make one important point about nations and their governments. To consider any country as simply a nation among nations, with the same powers, rights and responsibilities as any other nation, is a sign of respect. When Israel was founded, as much as that event was marked by conflict and injustice, the true intent was to create a new nation that would be equal to other nations in the sense that I have just stated, a country that a long-suffering and persecuted people could call their own.

It seems more than evident to me that there is always a difference between the people of a given country—the country per se—and whatever government that country may have at a given time. I am opposed, for instance, to the repressive and inhumane policies of the current Iranian government, but I do not hate Iranians as people. Even more to the point, I have strongly opposed the policies of my own government, yet I myself am an American and do not hate Americans.

Equating opposition to a government’s policies with hating the country itself, is a common rhetorical trick. It is nothing more than a way of silencing dissent without having to argue effectively with it. In fact, it exemplifies what I would call totalitarian thinking, since it identifies the people of a country with the state.

In the case of Israel, this rhetorical trick has the added potency of race and religion. If you publicly criticize the government of Israel in the U.S., I can guarantee that you will be accused of anti-Semitism. Keeping in mind the long and shameful history of Jewish persecution, culminating in the horrific genocide in Europe, this is a very serious accusation indeed. Although “anti-Semitism” is the common term, I will use the more explicit phrase “Jew hatred” here to avoid confusion, since the Arabs are a Semitic people as well.

Jew hatred has not gone away. It exists on the extreme right and extreme left. Because it has finally become generally unacceptable in society, it is usually disguised. We find it frequently on the “conspiratorial” fringes, by which I mean those groups that interpret world power relations in terms of certain groups of people that secretly control institutions. Recently someone told me that the Jews controlled most of the American media, and he named the heads of some of the networks and movie studios, as if this Jewish element somehow explained everything. Countering this argument with the names of numerous Gentiles wielding enormous power is only partially effective as an answer. The point is that ethnicity and religion are nothing more than lightning rods for scapegoating behavior. To believe in their significance is to claim an essentialist meaning for these categories, the same way a white supremacist believes that Africans are “inferior.”

Of course there is Jew hatred among Arabs and Muslims as well. And there is hatred of Arabs and Muslims among Jews, Christians, Europeans and Americans. The latter has been greatly encouraged recently within mainstream discourse in America, without the contradiction being widely noted.

Relying then on the power of all this history, and of the persistence of Jew-hatred in the world, the defenders of Israeli government policy routinely accuse those of us who criticize said policy of being Jew haters. If the dissenters are themselves Jewish, we hear the label “self-hating Jews.”

Returning to my original point, then, concerning the correct and respectful attitude towards nations, I contend that this defensive stance, taken by a large portion of the dogmatic pro-Israel forces and lobbyists in the U.S., is an infantile and disrespectful stance to take regarding the nation of Israel. They are claiming a special victim status for this particular country—rather than a nation among nations, they see Israel as an exception to the rules, a privileged nation whose government is exempt from criticism. For if you cannot criticize the policies and actions of Israel without therefore being a Jew-hater, any such criticism must be automatically invalid. This is totalitarian thinking.

I have had enough of this. What I see is a long-standing militaristic, anti-democratic faction within Israel dominating its political life and implementing policies that are profoundly inhumane and destructive. And if I oppose the aggressive expansion of settlements, the constriction of Palestinians within a system of virtual serfdom, and the killing of innocent people, including many children, in Gaza and the West Bank, I know there are those who will say I am unfair, pro-terrorist, anti-Israel, anti-Semitic. It’s a lie. And it is a transparent technique for avoiding responsibility. Using Jew hatred and the Holocaust as an excuse to justify whatever the Israeli government does is a strategy of cowardice. If Israel is the free and proud democracy that it claims to be, then it doesn’t need to hide behind a special victim status in order to function as a nation on the world stage. The United States continues to enable this blind dogmatism by writing the Israeli government a blank check for whatever it does, and then vetoing whatever actions the UN tries to take. I don’t hold a brief for Arab governments, which are by and large corrupt autocracies that do not serve their own people. But it does not aid the security of America, or indeed the world, for Israel to avoid making peace with the Palestinians, using the fear of terrorism to put off taking any action that would aid the progress of peace in the region. If Israel wants to claim moral superiority over their opponents, then it’s high time for them to show leadership in the cause of peace. The world sees the emptiness of official Israeli rhetoric. Fewer people in the United States are being fooled. And those who accuse critics and dissenters of Jew-hatred are actually hurting Israel more than any critic ever could. Blurring the distinction between actual anti-Semitism and honest criticism is bad for everyone.


Howard Schumann said...

I agree with you that anyone, regardless of religious persuasion should be able to criticize Israel without being subjected to the charge of anti-Semitism (or Jew hatred). I do not agree, however, that it is only Israel which has avoided making peace. Extremists on both sides have kept the inflammatory rhetoric going for too long a time.

When children from their earliest years are indoctrinated to hate, the chances for peace diminish.

For example, the Palestinian Media Watch disclosed that the new textbooks issued by the PA Ministry of Education in 2006, continue to reject Israel's right to exist. Palestinian terror against Israel is defined as acts of glorious heroism and fighting Israel is taught as a religious battle for Islam worthy of a great reward from Allah. They teach and idealize Jihad - war for Islam - and Shahada - death for Allah - as basic Islamic principles to which to aspire.

In a paper "Islam's Mandatory War Against Jews and Israel”, Itamar Marcus, Director of Palestinian Media Watch, describes how Islamic holy leaders teach that Jews are the eternal enemies of Allah and that the killing of Jews is Allah's will. Religious leaders in PA mosques continuously emphasize that the killing of a Jew is a religious obligation, that all agreements with Israel are temporary in nature and that the ultimate destruction of Israel is a certainty.

I know there are Arab haters as well in Israel and the business community seems bent on maintaining the status quo. yet I believe both the Israeli and Palestinian people want peace. They must, however, assert leadership to end extremist rhetoric no matter what the source. A solution in the Middle East is no longer “nice to have”. It has become imperative for the future well being of mankind.

Chris Dashiell said...

I don't really have an argument with you, Howard. What I'm addressing is that while Palestinians are constantly characterized as terrorists and undeserving of rights, Israel is given a pass within mainstream discourse in this country. Israel is much more powerful, yet demands to be held to a lower standard than other countries.

DED said...

Mr. Schumann has a point. Many Islamic children are taught that Jews drink the blood of Arab children on their holy days. So each new generation that comes along is poisoned with these lies.

My mother's family is Jewish, though I've never been a practitioner of the faith. I still have quite a bit of sympathy for the Jewish people, but I also believe that the Palestinians deserve their own state.

Yes, Dash, you're right about the incorrigible behavior of the Israeli government. A siege mentality has taken hold and they will do whatever they think is necessary to survive. Right or wrong. I don't believe this attitude will ever go away.

The U.N. is no help. Islamic countries gang up on Israel whether it behaves or acts out. But unless the U.S. leads the charge against an Islamic country's wrongdoing, no one else does. It's a circus of hypocrites.

So how do we protect the Palestinians from the bullying of the Israeli government and the Jews from the homicidal threats of its neighboring enemies?